Review: Bon Iver–Bon Iver, Bon Iver

You are not an indie band if you are verified by Twitter.

I’m so sick of hearing about this new album that I am going to listen to it right now as I type this. For the first time with my virgin ears. Thank you Rolling Stone for being one of the million places on the Internet that I can stream this album “exclusively” for free right now.

Anyhow, guess what. Bon Iver has come out with a new self-titled album (oh?!) and there’s absolutely no way that I can talk about it without sounding and feeling like a snotty hipster(?). If I hate it, I simply don’t know good music when I hear it. If I love it, I am following alongside Pitchfork’s compass, who gave this album a 9.5 on their rating scale. Out of 10. Maybe it is good. Maybe it isn’t. Don’t assume I’m qualified to talk with authority about it, because I’m definitely not.

When Wikipedia shows up as the 3rd result on Google following your band’s website and MySpace URL, you are not an indie band.

Bon Iver debuted in 2008, with album “For Emma, Forever Ago,” which consequently re-ignited a renaissance of focus on emotional masculinity in cultural constructs in indie music. Fact: us women inexplicably love the sensitive guys who own acoustic guitars and Moleskines (but always end up dating the assholes? Next Tumblr-dedicated blog?). Grouped alongside male indie heartthrobs, like Sam Beam as Iron and Wine, or Dallas Green as City and Colour, we can’t help but love it, or hate to love it but still like it. The music is soothing, calm, simple and the men behind it are straight-up attractive. I’m not trying to knock the entire genre, but for some reason, there’s something about my inability to escape Bon Iver these days that’s annoying the piss out of me.

I’m now halfway thru the album, and didn’t realize I had been listening to seperate tracks this whole time. It’s all blended by simplistic melodies with soft percussion and I’m lost in a sea of story-teller-esque lyrics and his dreamy, falsetto voice. It’s music to fall asleep to. But I’m too caffienated for that.

I could go on and list a plethora of Internet sources regarding the music’s validity, such as Rolling Stone calling it “excellent,” or Pitchfork exclaming the music and its maker are “irresistable,” etc. but you get the idea. Obviously, this album is riding on a huge wave of mainstream hype and for some reason, I’m indifferent.

I have since completed the album once through. I am having more fun googling and reading about the bearded-former-cabin-dweller-who-now-rolls-with-Kanye (real name Justin Vernon) than listening to the music itself and I have absolutely no desire to listen again. Let’s now over-analyze what that means for me as an individual in context of my alternative generation through a cultural lens and figure out if this means I am “post-indie” or something ridiculous. Just kidding. Someone brainwash me so I can fit in again following this disaterous post.

About KC

Writer, etc.
  • http://keepalbanyboring.com andrew

    From the Mishka Review: 

    There is really no nice way to put it……. this album blows diseased hammer. I made it to maybe track 5 and had a headache and threw the CD out my car window and 10 miles later was rear ended by an Indian man looking for his glasses on his floor (I blame all this on Bon Iver). MOThERFUCK BON IVER.

  • http://keepalbanyboring.com andrew

    also, there already is a tumblr called “i bang the worst dudes, sorry mom” 
    http://sorry-mom.com/

  • Guest

    at no point was this an album review. put this shit on your xanga

    • http://keepalbanyboring.com andrew

      except the part when the album was reviewed

  • http://katieanello.com katie

    pitchfork gave it a 9.5. I haven’t listened yet, but I will within the next few days.

  • http://www.facebook.com/THEKevinMarshall Kevin Marshall

    I really liked it, but think it falls slightly behind “For Emma, For Ever Ago.” I also see places calling it the Best album of 2011 so far. It’s good, but no way (though mine is King Creosote & Jon Hopkins’ “Diamond Mine” so your mileage may vary).

    • http://www.facebook.com/THEKevinMarshall Kevin Marshall

      Oh and the last track on that album is hideous Peter Cetera-era Chicago/Bruce Hornsby garbage. For shame, Vernon.

  • Anon

    Wait, so you didn’t actually finish listening to the album in it’s entirety before reviewing it? 

    • http://www.facebook.com/THEKevinMarshall Kevin Marshall

      She did. Read the last paragraph.

      • Anon

        Right, the actual review was condensed within the confines of a single paragraph, which isn’t what I’d consider a legitimate analysis of an entire album. This might sound subjective, but I believe that the entire point of a review is to determine the cultural significance of a piece of art, not to ruminate over the influence of popular music blogs while digressing into some strange form of self-commentary, ect. The fact that not even one individual song was analyzed for meaning or even mentioned at all seems to be an egregious oversight to me, and the idea that this album was seemingly disregarded simply because it was produced by a popular band is just ridiculous. Whether the album itself is actually good or bad is beside the point really, it’s just a matter of giving it the attention that any band deemed culturally/musically important rightfully deserves. 

        • http://twitter.com/KevinMarshall Kevin Marshall

          Actually, you’re wrong. The only qualification for a review is that it’s an evaluation of some sort. Which this is. You’re thinking maybe of a critique?Moot point, though, because it’s not supposed to be an academic dissemination of art, it’s a fucking blog called “Keep Albany Boring.”

    • http://twitter.com/kcorcutt kc orcutt

      Did anyone else reviewing it actually listen to it all the way through?

  • Anon

    wait, is this supposed to be about the music on the album, or your view on a now famous band and the media?

    • http://keepalbanyboring.com andrew

      is this a comment based on reading?

  • K2kid140

    It seems like you made up your mind that you wanted to be the “nonconforming-conforming-nonconformist” before you even listened to a single song.  I think next time you shouldn’t care what the “hipsters” might think and just honestly review it without worrying if you sound cool or not to a particular group of people.  If you love something or hate something, but give your own reasons, no one can justifiably accuse of following anyone else’s compass but your own. 

  • Herm

    music > talking about music

    shut up, you guys

  • Michael Dee

    i think it’s totally reasonable to get annoyed at a band and want to not like them because of hype and seeing them everywhere, and bon iver’s current hype is definitely exaggerated. but i also got the impression from this post that you weren’t really giving it a chance, and agree with the comment above that you’d “made up your mind” before you listened to the music. i’m not saying you should like the album, and i like a lot of the stuff you said about the hype cycle (remember kanye’s last album?) and the weird gender stuff going on in mainstream-indie right now, but for what it’s worth, i liked a few of the songs on the album and hated some other ones. i’m not sure that bon iver is the best target for this kind of hit job – i’d go for something legitimately offensive like jessie j.

    and yeah, bon iver’s not indie. but i don’t think “indie” has been a meaningful genre signifier in years, it’s just a way for journalists to compartmentalize it and sell it to readers.

  • Andrew Beam

    This review might actually be more pretentious than when Pitchfork reviews albums. Congrats.

  • Rangerzinsser

    I am a fifty-something who is always looking for the next album or artist to sweep me off my feet(e.g., Deerhunter). I use Pitchfork as my home page despite an overwhelming amount of musical reviews that I can barely comprehend. Still, I enjoy the breadth and depth of Pitchfork’s effort. Having read Pitchfork’s glowing review of Bon Iver’s  self-titled second release, I’ve attempted to watch Bon Iver performances via the web four or five times. I find the snippets I’ve sat through boring, tedious, and cringe-worthy.

  • Gerold

    Elliott Smith fans would dig this. All the songs sound the same and the vocals are painfully listless.

  • RafaelPernia

    fleet foxes, grizzly bear, panda bear, animal collective… all those bands should be banned from car-listening for safety reasons.